← MenuEPR Fourth LayerTNH
Module 05
0:00 / 0:00
0%
Module 05

Reactor Types

From gas-cooled pioneers to the next generation of small modular reactors — exploring how different designs solve the same fundamental challenges.

4
Reactor types in UK
9
Operating reactors
60+
Years design life
3.2 GW
Hinkley Point C
Section 5.1

UK Design Timeline

Every reactor design reflects the constraints of its era. Explore how the UK's choices evolved over 70 years.

Why Different Designs?

Different countries developed different reactor types based on what was available to them — their resources, their expertise, and their priorities at the time.

The UK's reactor evolution tells a story of adapting to constraints: from the 1950s when we couldn't enrich uranium, to today when we're building the world's most advanced designs.

📅 Interactive: UK Reactor Timeline

Click each decade to see what constraints shaped reactor choices, and why the UK made the decisions it did.

1950s
1970s
1990s
2020s
📘 Key Insight

Every reactor type represents a rational engineering response to the constraints of its time. Understanding why each design was chosen helps explain the UK's unique nuclear landscape.

Section 5.2

Gas-Cooled Reactors: Magnox & AGR

The UK pioneered gas-cooled reactor technology — designs found nowhere else in the world.

Gas-cooled reactors use carbon dioxide (CO₂) to carry heat away from the fuel, and graphite to slow neutrons. This combination was the UK's answer to a 1950s problem: how to build reactors without enriched uranium.

The key thing to understand: in these designs, the moderator (graphite) and coolant (CO₂) are separate materials. This has important safety implications we'll explore below.

Magnox: Britain's Pioneering Design

Generation I 1956 – 2015

Magnox reactors were the world's first commercial nuclear power programme. The name comes from the magnesium non-oxidising alloy used to clad the fuel.

Designed when the UK lacked enrichment capability, Magnox used natural uranium with graphite moderator and CO₂ coolant.

FuelNatural uranium metal
ModeratorGraphite
CoolantCO₂ gas (~400°C)
Output50-200 MW
📘 Key Term — Preview

Enrichment: Natural uranium contains only 0.7% of the fissile isotope U-235 (the rest is U-238). Enrichment is the process of increasing the U-235 concentration — typically to 3-5% for reactor fuel. This makes the chain reaction easier to sustain, enabling more compact reactor designs. We'll cover the enrichment process in detail in a later module on the nuclear fuel cycle.

AGR: The Advanced Design

Generation II 1976 – 2030

The Advanced Gas-cooled Reactor evolved from Magnox with one key improvement: enriched uranium with stainless steel cladding allowed operation at much higher temperatures.

AGRs are uniquely British — no other country has built this design.

FuelEnriched uranium oxide
ModeratorGraphite
CoolantCO₂ gas (~650°C)
Output500-600 MW
Efficiency~40% (highest of any thermal reactor)

The Graphite Challenge

AGR operating life is limited by the graphite core. Over decades, neutron bombardment causes graphite bricks to crack and lose weight.

This is why AGRs cannot run indefinitely — the graphite eventually reaches its safe operating limits. Heysham 2 and Torness will close by March 2030.

⚛️ The 3 C's in Gas-Cooled Reactors

🎛️
Control
Graphite moderation + control rods
❄️
Cooling
CO₂ gas circulation
🛡️
Containment
Prestressed concrete vessel
Section 5.3

Water-Cooled: The PWR

The Pressurised Water Reactor is the world's most common design, making up ~70% of the global fleet.

Here's the fundamental shift from gas-cooled reactors: in a PWR, water does both jobs — it cools the fuel AND slows neutrons. This isn't just simpler engineering; it creates a crucial safety feature called thermal feedback.

When we compare AGR and PWR below, pay attention to how this single difference — separate vs combined moderator/coolant — affects the reactor's behaviour when things heat up.

One Material, Two Jobs

Generation II Global Standard

The PWR's defining characteristic: water serves as both coolant AND moderator. This dual-role approach dominates globally because it provides inherent thermal feedback — a safety feature gas-cooled reactors cannot match.

FuelEnriched uranium oxide
ModeratorLight water (same as coolant)
CoolantPressurised water (~325°C, 155 bar)
UK ExampleSizewell B (~1,200 MW)
📘 Key Term

Thermal Feedback: In a PWR, when temperature rises, water expands and becomes less dense. Fewer water molecules means less moderation, which reduces power automatically. The physics self-regulates — like a built-in thermostat.

🔬 Interactive: Reactor Cutaway Comparison

Toggle between AGR and PWR to see the structural differences. Animated particles show coolant flow.

💡 The Key Structural Difference

In an AGR, you can see distinct graphite blocks forming the moderator structure, with CO₂ channels running through. In a PWR, there's no separate moderator structure — water fills the entire vessel, surrounding the fuel and doing both jobs at once.

🔄 Interactive: Refuelling Comparison

The different structures enable different refuelling approaches. Click to see how each reactor refuels.

AGR — On-Load Refuelling

Reactor:
OPERATING
Power:
100%
Activity: Normal generation
Reduced power process: Power reduced to ~70% during refuelling. ~8 assemblies replaced per week. Each assembly stays in reactor ~5 years.

PWR — Shutdown Refuelling

Reactor:
OPERATING
Power:
100%
Activity: Normal generation
Batch process: Complete shutdown required. Cavity flooded for radiation shielding — fuel handled underwater. ~⅓ replaced every 18-24 months. Outage: 4-6 weeks.

⚛️ The 3 C's in PWR

🎛️
Control
Water moderation + control rods + thermal feedback
❄️
Cooling
Pressurised water at ~325°C
🛡️
Containment
Steel-lined reinforced concrete
Section 5.4

The EPR: Generation III+ Safety

The European Pressurised Reactor represents the cutting edge of proven nuclear technology.

The EPR is a PWR at its core — it has the same thermal feedback safety feature. But "Generation III+" means it's been designed with extreme scenarios in mind: what if multiple safety systems fail simultaneously? What if the core melts?

The answer isn't to prevent every failure (impossible), but to ensure that even worst-case accidents stay contained. That's the EPR philosophy.

Building on PWR Technology

Generation III+ Under Construction at Hinkley Point C

The EPR is fundamentally a PWR — it benefits from the same thermal feedback. But it incorporates lessons from Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima into a design that can contain even the most severe accidents.

Output~1,630 MW (each unit)
Hinkley Point C2 × EPR units = 3,260 MW
Design Life60 years
Expected Operation2029-2031

What Makes It "Generation III+"?

4 Independent Safety Systems

Four completely separate emergency cooling trains. Any single one can safely shut down the reactor.

Double Containment

Inner steel-lined concrete + outer reinforced concrete shield. Designed to withstand aircraft impact.

Core Catcher

Specialised structure to catch, spread, and cool molten fuel if it ever escaped the vessel.

Extended Grace Periods

12-24 hours without any power or operator action. Time to respond even in total station blackout.

📘 Key Term

Core Catcher: A specialised structure beneath the reactor designed to catch and cool molten fuel (corium) in an extreme accident. The EPR's core catcher spreads corium over 170 m² and uses passive water cooling — ensuring even a complete meltdown stays contained.

🛡️ Interactive: EPR's Fourth Layer of Protection

In Module 4, we saw three barriers: cladding, vessel, and containment building. The EPR adds a fourth layer — a plan for if everything else fails. Click through to see how it works.

Section 5.5

Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)

SMRs represent a fundamentally different approach — factory-built modules assembled on site.

Every reactor we've discussed so far — Magnox, AGR, PWR, EPR — is a bespoke megaproject. Each one built on-site over a decade. SMRs flip this model: instead of bringing workers to the site, you bring the reactor to the site.

The Rolls-Royce SMR is still a PWR with thermal feedback. The revolution is in how it's built, not what it is.

A Different Way to Build

Generation III+ In Development

Instead of building massive power stations entirely on site, SMRs are factory-manufactured in standardised modules and transported for assembly.

The UK has selected Rolls-Royce SMR for deployment, with the first site at Wylfa on Anglesey.

TechnologyPressurised Water Reactor
Output470 MW
Construction~90% factory-built, transported by road
Build Time Target4-5 years
First SiteWylfa, Anglesey (early 2030s)

Why "Small" Can Mean "Safer"

A smaller core produces less decay heat after shutdown. This has profound implications:

🔬 Less Decay Heat

470 MW produces far less decay heat than 1,630 MW. Less heat = easier to cool.

🌬️ Passive Cooling Works

Natural convection can remove heat without pumps. Physics does the work.

⏰ Longer Grace Periods

72+ hours without power or intervention (vs 12-24 hours for EPR).

🏭 Factory Quality

Controlled manufacturing ensures consistency. Learning improves with each unit.

Build Your Own SMR

Click each module to assemble the plant. Unlike conventional reactors built on-site, SMR modules arrive factory-complete and are assembled like building blocks.

🏗️
1. Foundation
Prepared on-site
⚛️
2. Reactor Module
Contains core & vessel
💨
3. Steam Generator
Heat exchanger unit
4. Turbine Hall
Power generation
🛡️
5. Containment
Safety enclosure
🎛️
6. Control Room
Operations centre
Ready to Build
Click "Foundation" to begin assembly
Assembly Progress 0 / 6 modules

🔗 Full Circle

The first SMR site at Wylfa is the same location as the UK's last Magnox reactor (closed 2015). From Britain's pioneering gas-cooled technology to its newest innovation — nuclear power continues on Anglesey.

Section 5.6

Reactor Type Comparison

How do these reactor types compare at a glance?

Looking across all five reactor types, two clear trends emerge. First: moderator and coolant converged — from separate materials (graphite + CO₂) to a single material doing both jobs (water). Second: passive safety improved — from relying on operators and pumps to designs that cool themselves using physics alone.

The table below highlights these differences. Pay particular attention to the thermal feedback row — it's the single most important safety distinction.

Feature Magnox AGR PWR EPR SMR
Fuel Natural U Enriched UO₂ Enriched UO₂ Enriched UO₂ Enriched UO₂
Moderator Graphite Graphite Light water Light water Light water
Coolant CO₂ gas CO₂ gas Light water Light water Light water
Thermal Feedback No ✗ No ✗ Yes ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ✓
Output 50-200 MW 500-600 MW ~1,200 MW ~1,630 MW ~470 MW
UK Status Decommissioned Closing 2030 Operating Construction Development

Key Trends

💧 Convergence on Water

All modern designs use water for both cooling and moderation, providing built-in thermal feedback.

🔒 Enhanced Safety

Each generation adds safety features. Gen III+ includes multiple independent systems and passive cooling.

⚡ Enriched Fuel Standard

Natural uranium (Magnox era) enabled simpler designs but limited efficiency. Modern reactors all use enriched fuel.

🏭 Modular Future

SMRs represent a shift from bespoke construction to factory manufacturing — potentially transforming nuclear economics.

⚛️ The Common Thread: 3 C's Across All Types

Every reactor — regardless of design — must solve the same three fundamental challenges:

🎛️
Control
Manage the chain reaction
❄️
Cooling
Remove heat (including decay heat)
🛡️
Containment
Isolate radioactive materials
Section 5.7

UK Nuclear Map

See where each reactor type is located across the United Kingdom.

Notice the pattern: almost every UK nuclear site is coastal. That's not coincidence — reactors need vast amounts of cooling water. The sea provides an unlimited, reliable heat sink.

Use the filters below to explore where different reactor types are located, from decommissioned Magnox sites to the EPR under construction at Hinkley Point C.

Filter by Reactor Type
Note: Some sites have multiple facilities (e.g., Sizewell has both Magnox-era Sizewell A and PWR Sizewell B). Decommissioning timelines span decades — Magnox sites won't achieve final clearance until 2060s-2090s.
Section 5.8

Knowledge Check

Test your understanding of reactor types — 6 questions.

Question 1 of 6
Section 5.9

Key Takeaways

The essential points from this module.

01

Design Reflects Constraints

Each reactor type represents a rational response to the resources, priorities, and knowledge of its era.

02

UK's Gas-Cooled Legacy

Magnox (decommissioned) and AGRs (closing 2028-2030) use graphite moderator + CO₂ coolant. High efficiency but no thermal feedback.

03

Water = Built-in Safety

PWR, EPR, and SMR all use water for both cooling and moderation, providing automatic power reduction if temperature rises.

04

The Future: EPR & SMR

EPR adds multiple safety layers and core catcher. SMR adds factory construction and enhanced passive cooling.

🎉 Module Complete!

You've completed Module 5: Reactor Types. In the next module, we'll follow the fuel cycle — from uranium in the ground to permanent disposal, and the surprising question of whether "waste" is really waste at all.